JD Spicer Zeb Solicitors Banner Image

Useful Information

News and Events

Should You Say "No Comment" in a Police Interview?

  • Posted

There are various options in a police interview that you attend voluntarily or under arrest. Our only concern is to make sure that you are not charged. Where you are going to be charged we will do what we can to mitigate this and attempt an out-of-court result such as a caution or community resolution.  Every client and case is different. Sometimes sadly bad advice can lead to you being charged.

As a recognised leading firm, we can offer legal aid services and enhanced private services to fully prepare your case in advance and allow you the best chance at the interview. We can see you in and out of office hours privately. 


You have the option to provide –

  1. No comment - give no account
  2. Comment - give your account
  3. A prepared statement - written statement during or after interview
  4. A prepared statement - retained until charged to attend court

The final advice we give to each client varies depending on several factors. A skilled Lawyer will also take into account factors such as mental health, disabilities, addiction issues, youth and vulnerability. We will consider emotional strength of our client at the time of the interview.

We must balance this against the ability of each individual client to handle the questions put to them and the tactics each investigating officer will deploy against the client. Some officers may give us limited disclosure on which to take instructions but then ask extensive questions about various matters.

A skilled adviser from our firm will be able to work out what is the best advice for you and your case. We will only give you the advice that will work in your best interests based on your instructions you give. Some clients will not wish to give adequate instructions for a variety of reasons, and we take into account what you tell us. Every case is different, and everyone has individual circumstances. We will listen and work out what is best for you.

The Right to silence in law

At common law, when being questioned about involvement in a criminal offence, a suspect is under no obligation to answer any questions. At trial, an accused person also has a 'right to silence', sometimes termed a ‘privilege against self-incrimination’.

The right to silence is a key feature of the criminal justice system in England and Wales and is generally recognised as being enshrined in the right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

It is the reason behind the cautioning of suspects required by the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE 1984). However, sections 34-37 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (CJPOA 1994) place important limitations on the right to silence. The provisions permit the court to draw inferences against an accused person in specific circumstances. These inferences are known as adverse inferences.

Many people assume that, by saying “no comment” during a police interview, you are automatically putting yourself on the backfoot and will be, in some way, incriminating yourself. However, this isn’t necessarily the case.

In England and Wales, you have a right to silence during criminal proceedings. This means that you are protected from facing any adverse consequences if you choose to make “no comment” when facing questions from the police.

However, remaining silent when being interviewed isn’t always the most appropriate course of action. Here, we discuss when it may be appropriate to make “no comment”, why it is not always the best option and why legal advice is essential if you find yourself under investigation from the police.

When might you say, “no comment”?

The decision to remain silent when questioned by the police can be a difficult one and will depend on various circumstances.

The best course of action could be to remain silent where:

  • You have no recollection of the alleged offence and cannot provide an accurate account
  • You do not understand the line of questioning
  • You are not guilty of the offence, but may have concerns about being implicated for a separate offence

Most importantly, saying “no comment” will be the right course of action if it is specifically recommended by your solicitor. For example, your solicitor may advise you to remain silent because your arrest could be considered unlawful, or there is a serious lack of evidence tying you to the alleged offence.

What are the benefits to saying “no comment?”

The most obvious benefit to saying “no comment” in a police interview is that you will not be adding an immediate strength to a prosecution case. In certain situations, this may leave a prosecution with insufficient evidence to charge you.

However, it is important to note that simply saying “no comment” will not always be enough to prevent you from being convicted. In fact, under certain conditions, it has the potential to backfire.

Why might saying “no comment” cause complications?

It is important to note that, while you have a right to remain silent and this should give you the privilege against self-incrimination, it may not be the most appropriate response in certain situations.

The condition often attached to the answer “no comment” is often referred to as ‘adverse inference’.

For example, the court may draw adverse inference if you are questioned by the police and you do not mention a fact which you later rely on for your defence in court. If you had the opportunity to share the information and you instead chose to remain silence, this could ultimately count against you.

Adverse inference may not be drawn if you are able to provide a clear explanation for your decision to remain silent during the original questioning.

The specific circumstances are:

  • Section 34 - fails to mention facts which they later rely on in their defence at trial which they could reasonably have been expected to mention at the time of the interview.
  • Section 36 - fails to account for the presence of an object, substance mark or mark on an object.
  • Section 37 - fails to account for their presence at a place at or about the time of the commission of the offence

What does adverse inference mean?

The term 'adverse inference' means the court is permitted to draw ‘such inferences as appear proper’ including a negative conclusion from the defendant's silence; in other words, the court may hold the defendant's silence against them.

The significance for the tribunal of fact of a failure by the defendant, when first questioned, to mention facts which they later rely on at trial is whether or not that failure is an indication that the facts which are now being advanced can or cannot be relied on.

One inference that the jury or magistrates’ court may draw is recent fabrication ie. that the defendant remained silent when interviewed because they did not have an adequate explanation for their conduct and they have since fabricated the facts that form their defence.

Alternatively, the inference may be drawn that the suspect did not put their defence forward when interviewed by the police because they did not believe it would stand up to further investigation by the police.

Why might you comment?

If you are being interviewed by the police, you also have the option to give your account. While this may not be an appropriate option for everyone, depending on circumstances, it may be the correct approach if your comments strengthen your defence.

However, before making a comment, it is essential to speak to a criminal defence solicitor, who can carefully advise you on whether it is in your best interests to make a comment and whether doing so would compromise your position.

Why might you provide a prepared statement?

There are two types of prepared statements you can make in response to police questioning. You can provide a written during or after an interview, or you can have a statement retained on file, for it to then be handed to the police or prosecution until you are charged to attend court.

A prepared statement during or after the interview process allows someone to control the amount of information they disclose to the police. There are certain scenarios where a prepared statement during a police interview may appropriate, such as if your legal advisor believes the police are not providing full disclosure of the evidence they hold and may attempt to spring a surprise during questioning. You may not be strong enough to withstand unfair or difficult questions from officers. You may come across badly in interview as not everyone responds well to authority of police or investigators.

A prepared statement that is retained on file and is only divulged after someone is charged to attend court, may be drafted if you do not wish to divulge defence unless absolutely necessary. For example, someone’s defence to a charge may be that they were having an affair at the time of the alleged offence – something they would not want to reveal unless absolutely necessary to their defence. Another example may be that you may wish to avoid implicating a loved one or friend and may wish not to reveal certain information. We have succesfully used this process in many trials over the years.

Why you speak to a criminal defence solicitor before a police interview

If you are arrested or called to the police station for a voluntary interview, it is essential that you enlist the support of a specialist criminal defence solicitor.

They will be able to carefully assess your situation and, from here, be able to provide advice in relation to the types of questions you are likely to be asked. They will weigh up the pros and cons of remaining silent in response to certain questions, ensuring that you have the strongest possible defence against the allegations levelled against you.

Get immediate specialist legal advice for police interviews

If you are arrested, or are due to face an interview with the police, our criminal defence solicitors are on hand to lend their expertise and ensure you receive the best possible defence to the allegations you are facing.

Using our detailed knowledge of criminal law, we can advise you in relation to answering police questions and whether making “no comment” is the right approach for your personal situation.

Our vast experience of the criminal justice system means that you can be confident that your case is in the most dedicated and experienced hands. We will provide clear advice in plain English along with sympathetic personal support to help you through this difficult time.

You can contact us 24-hours a day, seven days a week for an immediate free initial consultation, expert legal advice and representation.

Our highly experienced criminal defence lawyers offer:

  • 24/7 legal support in person and over the phone, 365 days a year
  • Representation anywhere in England or Wales
  • Accredited Police Station Representatives to support you during a police interview
  • Clear, effective legal advice in any language (see our languages spoken)
  • Local offices in LondonBirmingham or Manchester

If you need immediate advice and representation, please use our emergency contact numbers:

Birmingham – 07891 777090
Brent & Camden – 07836 577556
Manchester – 07798 701339

Bespoke Private Fee Service

If you believe your case is likely to have serious consequences for you now, or in the future and you have the means to pay for this service

Read More

Do we offer free consultations? 

Read More

How can we help?

Common questions

We always work with the most experienced and best leading UK barristers, KCs (Kings Counsel). We cover all criminal cases 24/7 at the police station and court. Offices in London, Birmingham, and Manchester cover cases across England and Wales. We can offer Legal Aid and affordable Private fee agreements. We can see you the same day, including virtually. Our Senior Partners supervise all of our cases.

How quickly do you respond?

We respond quickly even during out of hours. We do not get our work by paying for online adverts but based on the fact that few criminal law firms can match our 45 years of experience. Most of our cases are still from word-of-mouth recommendations from satisfied clients. We are called daily by dissatisfied clients from firms with less experience than us. We respond very quickly to new enquiries. We know what clients seek and so we update clients rapidly.

Can you get cases dropped?

Yes, read about the recent cases we've helped our clients with here.

We always keep you updated and give straightforward advice. We will get cases dropped early where the case is weak or should not be prosecuted. We will be upfront with you about where you can benefit from a good result with an early guilty plea, such as a discount on your sentence. As we work on cases across all levels with clients from all walks of life, we are excellent at giving clear, spot-on advice. As an established firm, we can allocate a whole team to your case often at short notice to secure evidence to minimise the damage to you. 

Have you won any awards?


"JD Spicer Zeb demonstrated a clear commitment to client service through their work with vulnerable and diverse individuals in what can be severely traumatic circumstances".

Do you offer free consultations?

Where it is possible, we aim to provide an initial consultation to you. If we can speak to you, we can if required inform you about  –

  • Whether we can take the case on and our relevant experience.
  • Public and private funding benefits.
  • Assistance in applying for legal aid where we are likely to accept instructions.
  • An outline of options in police interview only. We will not advise you on which option to adopt.
  • Providing our free written guide explaining the police station process.
  • The gravity of routine and day-to-day offences you face.
  • Consequences of not attending the court or police station.
  • Consequences of interfering with any witnesses.
  • Retaining any evidence in support of your case.
  • If possible an outline of the elements of the offence that the police or CPS must prove.
  • This consultation will normally be by telephone or email and will only be for as long as we deem necessary to establish if we can act for you. If we cannot usefully give you any advice in this manner then we will not continue with the consultation. We will not discuss the case in depth for you to be able to decide on your plea or any significant aspect of the case, as this cannot be undertaken informally.
  • Referring you, if possible, to other firms for matters out of our specialism or if we cannot help.

Consultations do not apply to the following cases –

  • If we do not intend to take the case on.
  • Road Traffic cases, drink driving, drug driving, driving bans, speeding, no insurance, mobile phone use, points etc.
  • In all cases where we do not have the capacity to take your case or the availability of suitably qualified staff to provide an initial free consultation. This is applicable in all cases but especially where a more senior lawyer is required because of your personal needs or the complexity of the case.
  • Harassment/stalking/ coercive behaviour/malicious communications or road traffic cases and most sensitive cases. These cases are often too complicated to assess in short consultations.
  • The locations concerned may be too distant to represent you adequately or it may not be cost-effective for you or us.
  • The case is too complicated to assess or raises various charges or facts, complexity, or history to be considered informally or in a short consultation.
  • In most Legal aid transfers where legal aid is granted to another firm except in very grave cases, we may assess the case and merits for a transfer.
  • If your relationship has broken down with your existing solicitor or several solicitors.
  • If you have been released under investigation and have already had a police station attendance. 
  • If you hold legal aid with another firm and seek a second opinion.
  • If you are calling on behalf of the client as a friend or family member unless you have full authority and full facts.
  • To businesses.
  • Advising whether you were given good advice by your other solicitor.
  • Whether to decide to plead guilty or not guilty.
  • Whether you have an arguable defence in law or factually complicated defences.
  • Any advice you have had after your first court appearance.
  • Any advice on appeal on conviction or sentence.
  • If we feel we are unable to communicate with you.
  • If we are likely to be conflicted or breach our professional rules.